Skip to content

News · Regulation

FinCEN withdrew two wallet proposals that had never taken effect.

The 2020 unhosted-wallet reporting draft and the 2023 mixer special measure are withdrawn. Exchanges did not lose the rules they already follow.

ECGBy EasyCryptoGuides · Editor · Published · 3 min read

Printed documents on a desk with a pen
Photo on Unsplash
In this article

On 5 October 2026 the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network withdrew two proposals that had hung over self-custody for years. The first, from December 2020, would have required banks and money services businesses to keep records on certain convertible-virtual-currency transactions over $3,000 involving unhosted wallets — wallets not held by a financial institution — to verify the customer, and to report transactions over $10,000. The second, from October 2023, would have designated international crypto mixing a class of transactions of primary money-laundering concern under section 311 of the USA PATRIOT Act, and required reports that included wallet addresses, transaction hashes, and IP addresses. Both withdrawals were published in the Federal Register and took effect on 6 October. FinCEN said it had considered the comments and was acting as part of a deregulatory agenda, and to keep digital-asset rules fit for purpose.

Read the tense. These were proposals. They had not taken effect. Withdrawing them means the extra reporting they described will not start. It does not repeal the Bank Secrecy Act duties exchanges and other regulated firms already have: identify customers, screen for sanctions, and file reports when the existing rules say to. Killing a draft is not a new right to skip those.

What happened

FinCEN tied the move to the July 2025 report of the President’s Working Group on Digital Asset Markets, and said the mixer proposal could have chilled lawful activity and loaded a heavy reporting duty onto financial institutions. The unhosted-wallet draft had been the one people quoted when they said Washington was about to ID every withdrawal to a personal wallet above a few thousand dollars. It stayed a notice of proposed rulemaking for almost six years. A notice is not a duty until a final rule says so. The Federal Register citation for the withdrawal is FR Doc. 2026-20430.

The same week, Treasury designated the A7 payment network and FinCEN proposed a ban on transmittals involving A7’s sub-agents. That is a named-network action, with an alert of red flags for compliance teams. It is a different document from the class-wide mixer proposal that just died. One names a set of actors. The other would have named an activity. Do not let a headline merge them into “mixers are legal” or “mixers are banned”.

Do not mash this into the Samourai arrests. Those were a criminal theory about a specific mixing service. Do not mash it into OFAC’s 2022 Tornado Cash sanctions, a designation of addresses, which is a different statute and was not withdrawn on 6 October. If you need the older instrument, see OFAC listed Tornado Cash. That is a sanctions list, not a code review. This page is two FinCEN proposals leaving the docket.

Why it matters

If you withdraw bitcoin from an exchange to an address you control, the exchange may still ask who you are. That question comes from rules that are already in force, and from the exchange’s own terms. It does not come from the 2020 proposal, because that proposal never started, and it will not come from it now, because the proposal is withdrawn. If you use mixing software, you did not gain a safe harbour on 6 October. Sanctions, fraud statutes, and the rules that already apply to businesses are still there. See how crypto wallets actually work: an unhosted wallet, in FinCEN’s dialect, is what this site usually just calls a wallet. The jargon was about who does not sit in the middle.

A practical checklist for keeping crypto safer did not shrink because a draft died. Phishing, fake support, and reused phrases are not a Federal Register problem.

What happens next

The withdrawals are done. They do not need a comment period in reverse. A future FinCEN can propose something narrower, or something that looks like these drafts again. Watch the Federal Register, not a claim that self-custody was banned until Tuesday and freed on Wednesday. Nothing in this notice tells you to move coins, mix them, or leave them on an exchange.

Not legal advice. Not a statement that any particular wallet, mixer, or transaction is lawful.

Topics

This article is for information only and is not financial advice. Cryptoassets are volatile and you can lose money. See our disclaimer.

Comments

Keep it civil. First comments wait for an editor. This is not financial advice, and we remove spam or “DM me for signals” posts.

No comments yet. Be the first — keep it civil, and skip the tips.

Sign in to comment. Reading never requires an account.

Back to top

Continue reading

Stay a little clearer on crypto

Guides, reviews, and the news that actually matters. Unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing you agree to our privacy policy.

More news

View all